Base trading bot comparison

Bloom vs Terminal (Base)

Compare confirmed Base controls and product scope. Terminal is the current name of Padre.

Updated 2026Feature-based comparisonWorkflow-focused analysis

Quick verdict

Bloom and Terminal differ in order types: Market, Limit, Copy, Afk +2 more confirmed versus Market, Buy dip, Stop loss, Take profit +2 more confirmed · Web.

Bot rating summary

Bloom: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)
Terminal: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)

Feature comparison

Confirmed feature	Bloom	Terminal
Platform trading fee	1%	Up to 1%
Limit orders	Yes	Yes
Confirmed access surfaces	Telegram + Extension	Web
Interface languages	Not verified	Web: English, Chinese
Copy trading	Yes	Not verified
Multiple wallets	Yes	Yes

Fees comparison

Bloom: 1%

Terminal: Up to 1% advertised; exact universal rate unconfirmed. Network and protocol costs are separate.

Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.

Confirmed controls and integrations

Confirmed feature	Bloom	Terminal
Priority / gas fee control	Manual	Manual
Slippage control	Manual	Manual
Order types	Market, Limit, Copy, Afk +2 more confirmed	Market, Buy dip, Stop loss, Take profit +2 more confirmed · Web
Internal wallets	Yes	Yes
Multiple wallets	Yes	Yes
Wallet import	Yes	Yes · Web
Automated sells	Yes	Yes
Partial take-profit	Not verified	Yes
Take-profit	Not verified	Yes
Stop-loss	Not verified	Yes
Wallet tracking	Not verified	Yes
Launchpad discovery / execution relations	Not verified	Zora Creator (filter), Clanker (filter), Bankr (filter), Flaunch (filter) +2 more confirmed
Reward model (product-wide)	Cashback	Cashback
Referral model (product-wide)	Multi Level	Commission
Preset support	Yes	Yes

This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.

Instead of feature checklists, this comparison highlights structural differences like routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Base.

We do not treat execution speed as a static metric for Bloom and Terminal, since it depends on setup quality, RPC choice, region and network load.

In real conditions, performance differences depend on setup quality. That is why we focus on workflow and tooling instead of fixed execution-speed claims.

Terminal, formerly Padre, advertises a platform trading fee of up to 1%, cashback up to 35% and separate referral commission up to 40%. Exact account rates are unconfirmed. Network and DEX/protocol costs are separate. Only confirmed comparison overlap is shown; an omitted feature does not imply non-support. Discovery filters do not prove trade or sniper integration. Terminal reviewed 29 September 2026.

Base venues and limit-order exceptions

Reviewed 7 October 2026

Bloom supports Base token trading through its EVM bot and Manager. The current venue matrix includes Uniswap and Aerodrome, plus Virtuals and Zora token trading. Limit orders are not supported on the documented Uniswap V4/Zora routes, so a general limit-order badge is not a promise for every Base venue.

The inspected Base settings include gas, slippage, presets and quote currency. That panel did not show the MEV control seen on BSC and Ethereum; Base protection and private routing remain unconfirmed. LaunchCoin’s old Base association is not retained as a current confirmed integration.

Platform fee and transaction costs

Bloom’s standard token buy/sell fee is 1%. Signing up through a referral reduces that platform fee to 0.9%. Network gas, priority fees or validator tips, protocol/DEX costs and bridge fees are separate. Referred cashback is 10% of eligible standard fees; the net result when combined with the discount remains unconfirmed.

Bloom review and setup guide

Open Bloom EVM in Telegram