Base trading bot comparison
VS
GMGN vs Terminal (Base)
Compare confirmed Base controls and product scope. Terminal is the current name of Padre.
Quick verdict
Interface languages · web: GMGN — English, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Korean +8 more confirmed; Terminal — English, Chinese.
Which bot should you choose
Bot rating summary
- GMGN: ★★★★½ 4.6/5 (Very good)
- Terminal: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Confirmed feature | GMGN | Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Interface languages | Web: English, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Korean +8 more confirmed | Web: English, Chinese |
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Confirmed access surfaces | Web + Telegram + Mobile app | Web |
| Platform trading fee | 1% | Up to 1% |
| Multiple wallets | Yes | Yes |
Fees comparison
GMGN: 1%
Terminal: Up to 1% advertised; exact universal rate unconfirmed. Network and protocol costs are separate.
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Confirmed controls and integrations
| Confirmed feature | GMGN | Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Execution controls · confirmed examples | Automatic slippage, Manual slippage, Gas gwei, Automatic fee +2 more confirmed · Web | Priority fee, Slippage · Web |
| Internal wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Launchpad discovery / execution relations | Clanker (filter), Bankr (filter), O1 Exchange (filter), Flaunch (filter) +7 more confirmed | Zora Creator (filter), Clanker (filter), Bankr (filter), Flaunch (filter) +2 more confirmed |
| Multiple wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Wallet import | Yes | Yes · Web |
| Wallet tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Automated sells | Yes | Yes |
| Token discovery | Integrated | Integrated · Web |
| Take-profit | Not verified | Yes |
| Stop-loss | Not verified | Yes |
| Partial take-profit | Not verified | Yes |
| Slippage control | Manual | Manual |
| Priority / gas fee control | Manual | Manual |
| Reward model (product-wide) | Points | Cashback |
| Referral model (product-wide) | Revenue Share | Commission |
| DCA orders | Yes | Not verified |
| Preset support | Yes | Yes |
How to read this pro comparison
This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.
Here we focus on the deeper product differences that impact real trading performance, such as routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Base.
We avoid publishing fixed speed rankings for GMGN and Terminal, since execution performance depends on factors like RPC quality, region, device performance, priority fees and network congestion.
Since real-world performance depends on setup, this comparison prioritizes product design and workflow differences instead of fixed latency claims.
Terminal, formerly Padre, advertises a platform trading fee of up to 1%, cashback up to 35% and separate referral commission up to 40%. Exact account rates are unconfirmed. Network and DEX/protocol costs are separate. Only confirmed comparison overlap is shown; an omitted feature does not imply non-support. Discovery filters do not prove trade or sniper integration. Terminal reviewed 29 September 2026.
Review links
Related comparisons
FAQ
Does an unlisted feature mean it is unsupported?
No. A missing value means the available data does not establish support. It is different from an explicit negative value.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.